All of these claims are malicious, false, meritless, and contrived. These baseless accusations are the fabrications of a disgruntled former employee, Yehuda "Jay" Draiman, a convicted felon who has been found guilty of charges leading to millions of dollars in judgments by the Illinois and federal court system.
Left with no legal or rational alternative, "Jay" has resorted to conjuring up false stories and contrived meritless accusations on the internet and public forums, to attempt to smear his former employer.
These facts can be verified by court records available from a Google search for "Multiut v. Yehuda".
Yehuda Jay Draiman is a former employee who was terminated in 2001 from Multiut Corporation when he was discovered diverting clients and funds of the company. He was subsequently found guilty of breaches of fiduciary duty, consumer fraud and deceptive trade practices and conspiracy, and a judgment in excess of $1.5 million was entered against him, in addition to several findings of contempt, by the Cook County Circuit Court & upheld by the Appellate court (ruling 1-03-0857).
http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2005/1stDistrict/July/Html/1030857.htm
Federal courts have also entered subsequent judgments against Yehuda and his wife Miriam for committing false bankruptcy filings in yet another attempt to defame his former employer. Federal courts declared the judgments to be non-dischargeable due to the fraud involved by Yehuda Draiman, for abusing the court system in a manner similar to the way he now attempts to abuse the internet. These facts can be verified by federal court records available from a Google search for "Doyle Draiman".
http://www.ilnb.uscourts.gov/JudgeDoyle/Opinions/Draiman_Yehuda.pdf
Public documents verify that 'Jay' was also convicted of 10 counts of wire and mail fraud during the 1980's. Nachshon, Yehuda’s brother, originally provided Yehuda with a job in the Multiut company subsequent to general assistance he provided to help Yehuda and his family following Yehuda‘s first stint of a four year sentence to the federal penitentiary for that conviction in the 80's. See United States v. Draiman, 784 F.2d 248 (7th Cir. 1986)
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/7th/023922p.pdf
Yehuda Draiman was also the subject of a special
investigation conducted by the Illinois Legislative Investigating Commission for the Illinois General Assembly (see:4/22/75 Illinois Nursing Homes: A Report to
the Illinois General Assembly). “Jay” was barred from serving in the nursing
home field after he defrauded a resident under his care of more than
$40,000. The report cites testimony from a resident stating that Yehuda offered
to return her money if she took a ride with him to his “bank”, and instead left
her stranded in a deserted cornfield in the dead of winter in 8 degree weather.
Only by luck was she spotted by a passerby who reported the incident to the
McHenry County Sheriff’s Department. When the sheriff’s office interviewed
Yehuda, he claimed “when they got out into the country she asked to be let out.
He let her out and drove back to Chicago…and found her purse in the back seat.” In these instances, as well as
the recent litigation, Yehuda Jay Draiman's tactic has been to invent illegalities
to accuse his victims of, in order to shift the focus of attention away from
him.
http://multiut.com/responses_to_YJD
/IL_Assembly_Report_04_75.pdf
The current posting is just another example of Yehuda Jay Draiman's tactics.
For more information about defamation attempts by Yehuda Jay Draiman, see www.Illinoisantidefamation.com or www.IllinoisDefamationProtection.com
For more information about the above corporations, see www.multiut.com or www.futurellc.com
For more information about CEO Nachshon Draiman, see www.nachshondraiman.com.